The DARPA Urban Challenge is over, and the winners have been announced. Six out of 11 cars crossed the finish line, completely autonomous without a human driver anywhere. Why do we care about this? Because cars that drive themselves have the potential to be much safer and increase the capacity of existing highways. As long as Will Smith doesn’t switch his car over to manual control, that is.

The cars in the Urban Grand Challenge drove themselves without any changes to the highways or communication between each other. If they could do it without those two, adding them will only make fully automated cars that much closer to reality. Work is underway to develop infrastructure for highways to communicate with cars, in an initiative known as Vehicle Infrastructure Integration, or VII. It’s ostensibly for safety, which is good, but the other improvement is in efficiency, as the space between cars can be decreased and computers can precisely calculate times to let one car maneuver without slowing the others down.

The latest development with VII seems to be the opening of the Connected Vehicle Proving Center in Ann Arbor, Michigan. The Michigan Department of Transportation seems to be making the most progress with VII, developing test beds such as that proving center to be used by the auto manufacturers. These developments could be worth paying attention to.

It is worth mentioning that improving flow on highways through automation will not come close to the capacity of mass transit (like the Metro). We wouldn’t have to worry about red light running, though.

Tagged with:
 

3 Responses to DARPA Urban Challenge: Autonomous Cars

  1. Anonymous says:

    While I disdain much of what the defense dept. does, I am very pleased with the scientific achievements of Darpa. These achievements will lead industry and changes in the future. Imagine a car that drives itself to the given location. Imagine all cars doing that, would there be car accidents?

       0 likes

  2. Adam says:

    while I am excited about our robot overlords next step, I feel that this sort of thing will make our roads even less pedestrian friendly. As it is if I am on a side street and there is a pedestrian crossing in the middle of the street I can slow down or shift my lane to avoid them. How is my robot car going to predict what they will do as well as I can.

       0 likes

  3. JM Palacios says:

    Good point, Adam. Can we really predict pedestrian movements, though? People can be pretty unpredictable sometimes.

    Anyway, pedestrian safety is one of the reasons why such technology will probably be used first on limited access highways. The nice thing about any kind of connected vehicles is that they would still be able to be driven manually when off the network. So you can still dodge jaywalkers if that’s your thing.

       0 likes

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*

This site is protected by Comment SPAM Wiper.