The signage at the stations and inside the train cars is now almost fully converted.
Airport link is coming . . .
If you enjoyed this article, please consider sharing it!
17 Responses to Pic O’ the Day: Airport Link is Coming
Leave a Reply
Contact Us!
Planetizen- Cities May Be Back, But Don't Forget About the Burbs May 22, 2013A review of June Williamson's new book reminds us that the need to retrofit suburbia is as urgent as ever, despite the ascendance of cities. Amanda Kolson Hurley explores the top five reasons 'why the suburbs are shaping up as the new frontier.' […]
- Is Congestion Pricing the Solution to San Francisco’s Traffic Woes? May 22, 2013A new report paints a grim picture of San Francisco’s traffic future. Without radical reductions in auto usage, the city’s downtown will be ‘mired in gridlock.’ Is a controversial congestion pricing scheme the solution? […]
- Why Is it Hard to Find Places to Ride Out a Tornado in Oklahoma? May 22, 2013You might be surprised to learn that in the area famously known as 'Tornado Alley', underground shelters and safe rooms are relatively rare. Several reasons, from physical to financial to cultural constraints, conspire to leave residents vulnerable. […]
- Will New Mayor Seize the Opportunity to Build a 'Truly Urban' L.A.? May 22, 2013The new mayor of Los Angeles is young, charismatic, and a champion of urbanism and smart growth. He should start using all these assets immediately to transform Los Angeles into the vibrant, transit-oriented city it can become, says Bill Fulton. […]
- New Jersey Drops VMT Fee for EV Fee May 22, 2013NJ legislation highlights the need to ensure that those who drive EVs pay their fair share of taxes to keep roads in good repair. A bill that would have charged a mileage fee for all vehicles was scrapped for a $50 flat registration fee for EVs. […]
- Envisioning a LEED-like Ratings System for Infrastructure May 22, 2013Bob Graves discusses the concept behind Envision, "a holistic framework for evaluating and rating the community, environmental, and economic benefits of all types and sizes of infrastructure projects." […]
- The Ups and Downs of the Bike Sharing Economy May 22, 2013What makes Capital Bikeshare, the largest such program in the U.S. with nearly 2000 bikes, a success? What are its shortcomings? Mohana Ravindranath investigates. […]
- Can Signage Change Perceptions About Disabilities? May 22, 2013With New York City's embrace, the dream of revamping the iconic blue-and-white handicapped symbol is becoming a reality. As NYC adopts "a more active representation of people with physical limitations," activists hope the change has a broader effect. […]
- To Stretch Strained Municipal Budgets, Build Smart May 22, 2013Utilizing 17 case studies, a new report from Smart Growth America examines the costs and benefits of competing development strategies. Any way you slice it, smart growth strategies are more financially prudent than building sprawl. […]
- Obama Could Tackle Climate Change on His Own; But Will He? May 22, 2013With a reluctant Congress unwilling to act, and the signs of a warming planet multiplying, the Editorial Board of The New York Times urges President Obama to utilize executive actions to address climate change. […]
- Cities May Be Back, But Don't Forget About the Burbs May 22, 2013
- Green Mobility Network
- An error has occurred, which probably means the feed is down. Try again later.
I’m excited for the Orange Line, but I hate how MDT never has cohesive marketing and signage. I’ve seen multiple different “official” Metrorail maps and they’re all different. The same can be said about all the different Metromover maps. MDT needs to get its logos, maps and marketing on board.
Can MDT please decide on a map, make it easy to read, and stick to it? Let’s try and create a solid brand here that’s going to get Miamians onto the Metro. Every other city can do it, so can we.
MDT definitely doesn’t know how to do marketing… totally confusing is all the different bus services they have, like:
- regular numbered buses
- locals
- MAXs
- circulators
- connections
- the 95 Express
- shuttles
- limiteds
- the Kendall Cruiser
- Midnight Owl
- flyers
Signage, maps branding, it’s all a big mess and keeps getting worse over time. Things really went downhill when the green and blue “M” was banished and replaced with the county logo which is really irrelevant to transit service.
Finally! At least we are getting something for our 1/2 penny sales tax. Yeah, the sign is confusing, but that can be changed with minimal hassel. Let’s just “get her done”.
The airport link, by rocketing the amount of tourists who use it, will really put in the spotlight its beach related shortcomings, and that’s a good thing. It may start a big push for some kind of baylink. And this time it will be the economy talking (tourists), not just whiny locals, which can only help its odds.
btw this is already a month behind schedule, however the april 31 date was never set in stone, just the goal.
I’ve been thinking about this for a while: does anyone know why they decided to put the separate line between the airport and the MIC rather than taking the Metrorail directly into the airport with a stop at the MIC? Was it just cost? Seems like having to change trains to go from the airport to get to Metrorail is somewhat inconvenient, especially if another line transfer will eventually needed to get to the Port or Sobe.
When this line opens, it will be a great day for transit here in Miami.
They said the cost was excessive and instead chose to spend *only* $200 million on the silly tram. So close yet so far away.
The mover was necessary to have a shuttle-type service every few minutes 24/7 between the airport and the MIC… having only the Metrorail running every 15-30 minutes for most of the day and closed overnight would have been more inconvenient to get from the terminal to the MIC.
Watch this video of what the county is planning for the east side of the MIC… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NXJa2kuIx4 It could be a great destination if anything like that gets built.
That doesn’t make any sense. People have to wait at the train station to get to the shuttle in the first place. It actually lengthens the trip to the airport (which could be direct). The only beneficiaries of the crappy shuttle are the schleps who have to use the parking garage.
If what is in the video never gets built we will all be lucky. It looks like a glorified office park. Creating good urbanism is not that difficult guys, and what is in this video does not even resemble good urbanism.
Oh, but i forgot – we are in Miami.
At least they had bike lanes in the video.
Bike lanes are not a once-size-fits-all solution. In an urban context (or when trying to create an urban context), we don’t push bike lanes as much as other treatments because it leads to extra wide streets that are not traffic calmed. Bike lanes are more appropriate for suburban conditions where you can start to take back street space from the car. But if you are starting from scratch (as in the case of this plan) you can design more urban bicycle facilities that do not lead to overly wide streets.
IMO, the Metrorail signage is fine, it’s the Metromover that is confusing. Perhaps we should have a contest to design metromover signage and send it to MDT to consider?
A huge improvement is going to be the flexibility to have trains more frequent along the “busy” part of the line from Dadeland to Civic Center. At least initially, the plan is to double the frequency where the green/orange lines intersect. I just hope they don’t cut the schedule back to 10-15 minutes next year, and have the airport service be a “shuttle” between Eerlington Heights and the MIC…
The new Metrorail signage is not great but not terrible either so maybe that’s progress… the Metrover is a mess the maps at stations are unreadable and outdated and the ones inside the cars are too small and confusing. I wish the money spent running the Miami trolley (which duplicates exactly the mover route) was used to properly maintain and improve the mover cars and stations.
As for that video, it may superficially look like an office park but it seems to illustrate an urbane and pedestrian and transit-friendly area. Just contrast that with a real office park like Blue Lagoon and you can see the difference.
In regards to the MIA Mover- the Mover was necessary to connect between the airport and Central Station. Let’s not forget that the Central Station is not just Metrorail, it’s also Amtrak, Tri-Rail, Metrobus and the Car Rental Center. Without it, we would need bus shuttles between the station and the airport, and the purpose of the plan was to reduce traffic at the airport and trains are more efficient. MIA Mover was necessary and they did a good job with it.
No John – not correct at all. Anyone coming in on Amtrak or Tri-rail would have just been able to transfer to the Metrorail (the way they will have to transfer to the shuttle. The shuttle was a completely unnecessary extra leg. Having Metrorail go directly to the airport would have saved money and made for a better connection to the airport. The only ones that are better served by the shuttle are the folks who park in the huge parking garage.
Henry Flagler- Yes, but the Mover is free and comes every couple minutes. The Metrorail costs $2 and service is more infrequent. You’d have to have a Metro station at the airport and one at the Central Station so that someone coming in on Amtrak can get on a Metro train at the Central Station to take it across LeJeune just to get to the airport. It doesn’t make sense.
It’s not just Metro riders coming in to the airport, so the MIA Mover makes sense for everyone.
Well this I started this, I should comment that what I was thinking of was Metrorail running directly into the airport with a stop at the MIC. Then, additional Metrorail cars could have run between the airport and the MIC for increased frequency. (Same cars, same track.)
Regardless I’m happy with it, even though I have no reason to use the new line.
The grand opening is set for July 28th.