Politics won out over reason Thursday night as City of Miami Commission Chairman Joe Sanchez pulled a political kamakazi with his ‘no’ vote on Miami 21. The vote was surprising because only moments before the vote he described the items that would have to be changed before second reading. Most observers have been scratching their head over this bizarre turn of events. The Chairman cited his concerns over potential property rights litigation, but he did not offer an alternative motion to consider the item without including the questionable properties (as chair of the commission we assume that he knows he can do that). I think the Commissioner has to think quick at this point if he is going to salvage any bit of his campaign.
Later he issued the following brief press release (I’ve added my comments in blue):
| Office of Chairman Joe Sanchez 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida 33133 |
FOR MORE INFORMATION: |
PRESS STATEMENT |
|
| Telephone: 305.250.5380
Fax: 305.250.5386 |
For Immediate Release August 7, 2009 Miami, FL
|
CHAIRMAN JOE SANCHEZ SETS THE RECORD STRAIGHT
ON MIAMI 21 VOTE
(Miami, FL) – Chairman Joe Sanchez issued the following statement regarding his no vote on the version of Miami 21 considered by the Miami City Commission on Aug. 6:
- It was painful to vote against a concept I believe in.
Mr. Chairman, as Mayor you will be faced with a variety of tough decisions. Part of being Mayor is setting priorities and sticking to them. This was one of the initiatives you supported. What happened? Is this the sort of flimsy leadership you will display once elected? I might not agree with Commissioner Regalado, but he sticks to what he says.
- For more than a decade, I have supported smart growth principals such as pedestrian-friendly development, public transit, bicycle lanes, neighborhood preservation, shade trees, parkland, green space and sustainability.
What good is all that work and leadership if you are going to play politics with one of the most important pieces of legislation you have been confronted with? Should you really be at the helm of organizations such as the DDA and Green Commission considering their strong support for the plan, and your apparent disregard for their opinion?
- Tragically, the version of Miami 21 that came up for a vote yesterday was tainted by restrictions that placed our residents in harm’s way by exposing us to tens of millions of dollars in lawsuits from loss of property value.
If you were really concerned about the budget then why not defer this meeting from the get go? As Chairman, I’m sure that you know the advertisement alone cost $50,000 (the cost of 2 Bike Miami Days). As with the Miami River properties that were not being included in the vote because they are under litigation, you could have simply removed questionable properties from the vote and moved forward.
- We are in a budget crisis that threatens to bankrupt the City, so I could not uphold my fiscal responsibility to the taxpayers if I approved that version of Miami 21.
See my previous comment. $50k = 2 Bike Miami Days. I hope you don’t cut Bike Miami Days from the budget now as a result of the money you wasted on advertising this meeting.
- However, I am extremely hopeful that this is a temporary setback to a common goal that is within our reach. Miami 21 must be revisited immediately after we have cut the bloated salaries and pensions that threaten our current budget.
- We now have a golden opportunity to resolve key issues and craft a pure version of Miami 21 that truly protects our neighborhoods and our City revenues.
- With all five Commissioners on the dais, we must reconsider Miami 21. We must adopt a final version of Miami 21 that truly is the people’s plan.
All five Commissioners would have been great, but don’t use that as a copout. You should have voted to approve. You still have time to correct this misstep. Let’s be honest: your campaign is dead as a doornail. Any voting constituency that you were previously courting you lost, and you definitely didn’t pick up any Regalado voters. As soon as Tomasito is elected he is going to put Miami 21 on the agenda (not subsatntially different) and it will get approved. Your ‘no’ vote will have been in vain. I can’t vouch that it will make a lot of difference for your campaign, but at least you can leave public office knowing that you contributed in a positive way to the future of our city. You have a chance at redeeming yourself, I hope you take it. Don’t delay, put Miami 21 back on the agenda, and vote to approve.
Related posts:
15 Responses to Say It Ain’t so, Joe
Leave a Reply
Contact Us!
Planetizen – Urban Planning, Design and Development Network- Toward a Universal Subway Typology May 16, 2012Brandon Keim explores the fascinating findings detailed in a new paper, which shows that the world’s major subway systems appear to be organically converging on an ideal form.read more […]
- Should the Bay Area Have Four Million More Residents? May 16, 2012Noting the Bay Area's relatively slow growth rate over the past two decades, Timothy B. Lee argues that the area's "bad housing policies" are harming business growth and investment opportunities in Silicon Valley.read more […]
- What Does "Creative Placemaking" Look Like? May 16, 2012Launched one year ago, ArtPlace works to accelerate creative placemaking by making grants and loans. So what does that actually look like on the ground? A new video from ArtPlace gives a glimpse of what they've accomplished so far. read more […]
- Cities Fight Over Shrinking Convention Pie May 16, 2012Despite a dramatic decline in the number of, and attendance at, conventions nationwide, cities across America are investing their limited resources in building and upgrading convention centers. Fred A. Bernstein explores the irony.read more […]
- What Are (Realistic) Options For Federal Transportation Funding? May 16, 2012With the unlikely possibility of the Congressional conference committee agreeing to a new transportation bill, much less an agreement to address the decreasing gas tax revenues to the Highway Trust Fund, Kathryn Wolfe looks at the remaining options.read more […]
- The Dangers of Walking While Poor May 16, 2012Low income people are more likely to get hit by cars. Kate Hinds reports on the social and infrastructural factors responsible for the disparity.read more […]
- Sprucing Things Up on the Wrong Side of the Tracks May 16, 2012Will French takes a look at the success of Birmingham's downtown revitalization, which – in the absence of a waterfront – embraced its historic railroads, instead.read more […]
- New York's Killer Trees May 16, 2012It sounds like the plot out of a bad B movie, but to the families of those killed and injured by falling limbs and branches from trees in New York's parks and public spaces, it's a real-life horror story that raises questions of municipal liability.read more […]
- Television Series Tackles Weighty Issue May 16, 2012Sarah Henry spotlights "The Weight of the Nation," a new series airing this week on HBO that explores obesity and its enormous economic, emotional, social, and health costs.read more […]
- What's Left for Venice in Its Golden Years? May 16, 2012Josh Stephens muses on the modern state of an erstwhile global capital that has kept its aesthetic charms, but lost its anima. read more […]
- Toward a Universal Subway Typology May 16, 2012
- John.Hopkins's blog
- Curds 'n' waves at Cabot ride sendoff May 13, 2012A few intrepid bicylists pedaled out from Miami's Bicentennial Park on Saturday to start the Cabot Community Tour, a 2,300-mile journey up the East Coast Greenway to Portland, Me. In this pre-ride photo by Suzanne Kores, the long-distance riders are in white jerseys. Cabot, the Vermont farmers' cheese cooperative, held a little fair for them on the […]
- Cyclists ride in Rocafort's memory May 7, 2012Hundreds of cyclists turned out on Sunday to honor cyclist Miguel Rocafort and appeal for the driver who struck him down on March 31 to surrender to police. "We'd like to encourage the guy who hit Miguel to turn himself in," said Eli Stiers, chairman of SafeStreetsMiami, a traffic safety campaign of Green Mobility Network. "It […]
- Ride for Miguel on May 6 April 26, 2012As you probably heard, our memorial ride for Miguel Angel Rocafort was postponed because of Sunday's hard rain Rocafort, of course, was the cyclist who was fatally injured March 31 at SW 137th Avenue and Eureka Drive. The hit-and-run driver who ran him down still hasn't been identified, but there's probably someone out there who knows who it i […]
- Curds 'n' waves at Cabot ride sendoff May 13, 2012
I disagree.
Sanchez urged Manny Diaz to defer the item, it was even on the paper, but the Mayor wouldn’t budge.
The budget is more pressing than anything else. It means people’s jobs and cutting services to people.
Sanchez issued a statement claiming Miami 21 is not dead. Maybe, if other commissioners…aka (Sarnoff…Regalado) would vote for what’s best instead of adding more than 10 amendments to this plan because they’re using every single vote for political leverage, Miami 21 would’ve been approved last week.
I don’t know where you get off saying Joe’s campaign is dead. Just this weekend he knocked on my door. Regalado has yet to make any type of contact letting me know what he stands for, besides just voting ‘no’ on everything, including Miami 21.
Anon, What I didn’t say above was that I was a Sanchez supporter. Regardless of whether your arguments have merit (which I think some do), there are other ways that the Commissioner could have handled the decision. What a great legacy for him to have been the deciding vote to move forward.
I’m not saying that other Commissioners didn’t add to the problem, but as Chairman (and Mayoral aspirant) he should found a better way of handling the vote. It doesn’t help that he looked so confused at the end either.
Why do I think that his chances are shot? Because voters like me find this political ploy distasteful and disingenuous. He didn’t gain any voters, but he definitely lost voters. Seems like a loss to me…
As Chairman he can defer the item and the Mayor would have to veto it.
Joe is reaaallll good at sending out press releases. He did not defer it and only “urged” the Mayor.
You know what was another tough decision Joe? The Marlins stadium. Which is a financial fiasco!
The Mercy Towers AND Cubix.
Both of which overwhelming support from the local community came out against, and eventually sued the city and won!
What the hell were you thinking man?!
Wow. that’s all I have to say about that.
I hope Sanchez can step it up now. Regalado as mayor scares the s**t out of me.
I think WOW was the best response! What a fiasco… there is plenty of blame to go around- Sarnoff pilling on sweets for his district, Sanchez looking befuddled and confused failing to suggest an alternative motion, the administration failing to suggest the item be continued until a full commission could decide (even after the first vote). WOW, WOW, WOW
I invite everyone to come out Aug 26th to the Transit Forum at Capital Grille 6pm. Until we have transit we will not have a real city.
Please send this to the commissioner and to steven wright. I think the commissioner really believes this stuff that is written for him. He let us down. End of story.
My understanding is that Sarnoff attempted to add in language at the last second that would have exepmted his area from the Miami 21 height requirements on Biscayne, and Sanchexz’ no vote was predicated upon that portion.
To the Anon at 2:34
One of the things Sarnoff added was a height restriction. In the historical district of MiMo
Look Sanchez did the right thing by voting it down. What Sarnoff did was unbelievable with all of those poison pills he proferred. And Gonzalez missing the vote is inexcusable. Joe simply did not want to put the City at financial risk. In addition, he requested the vote be deferred but Mayor Diaz said no. Maybe Joe should of not voted like AG or like the County Commission when recently they decided not to vote on the millage rate.
Unlike the sneaky and petulant Sarnoff, Sanchez did the right thing.
Maybe voting down Sarnoff’s changes was the right move, but he could have very easily made another motion (after his no vote) to approve the code without the changes that Sarnoff proposed. That would have been a 2-2 vote with Sanchez and Spence-Jones voting yes, and Regalado and Sarnoff voting no. Why did he choose to take the political heat if Sarnoff was in the wrong? Doesn’t add up in my head.
or…
He could have just voted to approve and addressed the changes between first and second reading. Watch the last moments of the meeting.
He looks like he thought there was another motion, and only moments before he had been discussing the changes that needed to be made/issues to be addressed before second reading. It looks like he simply made a mistake.
[...] into a bittersweet stalemate when one of the up-to-then supporters, Commissioner Joe Sanchez, voted “No” on the plan, achieving a 2-2 result (the fifth City Commissioner was undergoing surgery that day), citing weak [...]
[...] into a bittersweet stalemate when one of the up-to-then supporters, Commissioner Joe Sanchez, voted “No” on the plan, achieving a 2-2 result (the fifth City Commissioner was undergoing surgery that day), citing weak [...]