MDX, Governor Scott Want to Toll Major Arterials
Under the guise of hosting a discussion about the future of mobility in South Florida, the Greater Miami Chamber of Commerce has brought our leading transportation officials together with anti-transit Libertarian Robert Poole to go over their plans to greatly expand toll roads in Miami-Dade County.
Tapped by our soon-to-be-one-term Governor as one of his transportation advisors, Poole has finished an 18 month ‘study’ of how to improve transportation in South Florida. The reason for the study, according to a press release, is that “[The 2035 Long Range Plan] puts a major emphasis on alternatives to driving—transit, bicycling and walking. In fact, of the $58 billion available for transportation between 2015 and 2035, the plan devotes 62% to improving and operating various forms of transit. Unfortunately, if the plan is implemented as written, by 2035 a smaller fraction of all trips (2.6%) will be made via transit than the 2.9% made via transit today.”
Fair enough. That might be true, but that has more to do with the over reliance on BRT over rail transit. The conclusions made by the report are nothing less than preposterous for transportation and urban planners, pointing to ‘managed lanes’ as the panacea to our mobility challenges. (Insert gag here).From the press release:
The plan includes four key components:
A region-wide network of expressway managed lanes (MLs) like those on I-95, encompassing 302 route-miles and 1,117 lane-miles;
Upgrades for 14 key arterials (107 route-miles) with underpasses at major signalized intersections, an innovation we call “managed arterials” (MAs);
Premium bus rapid transit (BRT) as in the current long-range plan, but operating mostly on the “virtually exclusive busways” made possible by the network of MLs and MAs, rather than on politically dubious bus-only lanes;
A series of system operational improvements, including extensive expressway ramp metering and further expansion of traffic signal coordination.
These four components tell a striking story of the city that Poole (and his cohorts at FDOT and MDX) would have us inhabit. On the one hand Poole contends our current Long Range Transportation plan (with its reliance on BRT) is not going to be successful, yet his plan relies on the exact same BRT system (as stated above). He proposes that MDX and the Governor create tolled highways out of major arterials (like US1 and Flagler), utilizing overpasses and underpasses that will be costly to build and blight the city, to create revenue AND ‘premium bus rapid transit’ corridors. Unfortunately, bus rapid transit does not work on highways where folks cannot easily get on/off. The best BRT systems in the world run at grade, in a dedicated lane, and in the city center. This plan is doomed to fail because it views transit as an afterthought.
The idea of using transit as a way to sweeten an otherwise bad idea is not new. We have been reporting for some time about MDXs plan to run a highway parallel to US1, under the dubious assumption that it will greatly improve transit service. (Meanwhile, low cost transit improvements that would greatly improve service, like signal coordination, go unimplemented because of their impact on local traffic.)
There is so much to dislike about this plan that it is hard to know where to start. First the idea of greatly expanding tolls on what Poole calls “urban toll expressways” (ie. neighborhood streets) will create highways in places where we are trying to lower speeds and increase pedestrian, bicycle and transit use. These highways will be in direct competition with transit, and rather than be subsidized by the government, the costs will be borne by the citizens of South Florida. Already saddled with high tax and few mobility options, the Governor and MDX will double down on a failed transportation system by taxing residents, so that they can in turn build more highways! The Ponzi scheme developed by MDX to build and toll and build some more will be spread all over the land.
I am all for bus rapid transit, but it should not be used as a chaser for the bitter pill MDX and the Governor are trying to push down our throats. We need to continue to build our rail network and then we can start to feed into it with BRT. If officials want to create bus-only lanes, the way that every other city in America is doing, great! Close a lane of Bird Road, Coral Way, 8th street…etc. and have BRT running to the heart of our metropolis in its own dedicated lane; but don’t start building highways all over the city. It’s time for MDX to wake up and realize that mass transit is the future of our region – not highways. If it doesn’t evolve, it might find that there are a great many people, myself included, who don’t see a reason for it to exist anymore. We want transit – not tolls.
10 Responses to MDX, Governor Scott Want to Toll Major Arterials
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Subscribe via Email
Find us on Facebook
Recent Comments
- Gabriel Lopez-Bernal on All Aboard Florida! Downtown Miami Map Preview and Rail-Trail Poll
- Rick Eyerdam on Highways and the Decay of Once Glorious Overtown
- Miami Planning History on All Aboard Florida! Downtown Miami Map Preview and Rail-Trail Poll
- Upper East Side on Overtown Commissioner Knows Her Highway History: FDOT Fails!
- Miami History on Overtown Commissioner Knows Her Highway History: FDOT Fails!
- Al Crespo on Overtown Commissioner Knows Her Highway History: FDOT Fails!
Recent Activity
Categories
Accident Architecture bicycles bike lanes Bike Miami Days biking Biscayne Boulevard Brickell bus Climate Change Coconut Grove complete streets Downtown Miami FDOT High Speed Rail Metrorail Miami Miami-Dade County Miami-Dade Transit Miami 21 Miami Beach Museum Park News Parking Parks Pedestrian Pedestrians Pic o' the Day Planning Real Estate Development Rickenbacker Causeway Sprawl Streetcar Traffic Transit Transitography Transit Oriented Development Transportation Tri-Rail Uncategorized Urban Design Urban Development Boundary Urban Growth Urban Planning Walkability
Planetizen: The Urban Planning, Design, and Development Network- Land in Conflict: How Planners Can Better Manage an Increasingly Contentious Public Process June 19, 2013Summary: Land use disputes are increasingly taking up our time and producing unsatisfying results. A new approach to resolving conflict based on mutual gains may provide a better way to manage the most challenging situations. […]
- With Improvements, Baltimore Seeks to Steal D.C.'s Thunder...and Residents June 19, 2013The last decade has brought tremendous growth and prosperity to Washington D.C., but it's neighbor to the north hasn't been so blessed. Planned infrastructure improvements are intended to lure new residents to Baltimore's cheaper cost of living. […]
- Bloomingdale Trail Gets New Name and Final Plan June 19, 2013Final plans for what will become the longest elevated park in the world where unveiled this week in Chicago. The 2.7-mile rail-to-trail conversion has been branded as The 606, a nod to the zip code digits shared by the neighborhoods along its route. […]
- Astrodome Among National Trust's List of 11 Most Endangered Places June 19, 2013The National Trust for Historic Preservation has released its annual list of America's most endangered historic places, the preservation community's most effective tool for bringing awareness and assistance to the country's threatened resources. […]
- Architect Ego Trip or Necessity for a Modern Metropolis? Paris Debates Skyscrapers June 19, 2013Following Mayor Bertrand Delanoe's overturn of a ban on buildings over seven storeys high, Paris is planning a dozen new skyscrapers outside the city centre. Debate over the towers is destined to become an issue in next year's municipal elections. […]
- Should Cities Eliminate Free Parking for the Disabled? June 19, 2013Ongoing research from the University of California Transportation Center documents the detrimental effects that free street parking for the disabled has on city coffers and performance pricing systems. Is it time to reconsider such laws. […]
- New Downtown L.A. Park Latest Victory in Mayor's Open Space Initiative June 19, 2013At .7 acres, downtown L.A.'s Spring Street Park isn't likely to invite comparison to the world's great urban parks. But for a city, and neighborhood, starved of quality open space, the new park is a significant achievement. […]
- University Housing: Bastion of Communal Learning or Luxury Resort? June 19, 2013John Eligon examines the private student housing building boom, and asks whether we are spoiling college students with luxurious off-campus amenities to the detriment of academic and social environments. […]
- How Parking Minimums Beget Ugly Urban Environments June 19, 2013In the Pacific Northwest, and elsewhere, excessive parking requirements dictate the form and footprint of buildings, mostly to the detriment of urban environments. In a lavish photo essay, Alyse Nelson explores the damage inflicted by parking laws. […]
- Hybrid and Electric Vehicle Fees are Here to Stay, and Spreading June 19, 2013It may seem counter-intuitive to charge extra fees for the cleanest, most fuel-efficient vehicles on the road today - including those that qualify for a federal $7,500 credit. But ten states are doing just that to keep roads well-funded. […]
- Land in Conflict: How Planners Can Better Manage an Increasingly Contentious Public Process June 19, 2013
- Transit Miami > MDX > MDX, Governor Scott Want to Toll Major Arterials
Archived Posts











Here Here. I recall the 2060 FDOT meetings, the bulk of people want rail transit and were vehemently opposed to new highway construction.
I guess that was thrown out the window too.
We absolutely have to focus on light (trolleys, etc.) and heavy (Metrorail, etc.) rail transit.
There should be absolutely no new highway development in our community. And our arterial roads should not be further transformed into quasi-highway speedways.
As Tony says, if you want to create *real* BRT along our arterials, do so by dedicating at least one of their lanes (some of them are already 4 or more lanes each way!) to Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) routes. And, of course, provide these dedicated BRT lanes with full bicycle facilities (at least 5′ wide bike lanes).
However, I’m all for the imposition of tolls on highways. People need an economic inducement to open their eyes to the convenience and efficiency of public transit.
Make driving automobiles on highways so costly that people realize that it’s simply uneconomical (and foolish) to commute to work in single occupancy vehicles.
Make driving the least desirable transportation option!
Its ironic. I am also a libertarian. However, Poole is off his rocker. How the heck is he an expert? Im sorry I may be fiscally conservative but taxes exist for a reason. I just believe the federal government has gone out of control as of late.
Worst proposal ever. We need passenger rail, Metro expansions, not more bridges, highways and roads. This proposal would take us back 60 years into the Stone Age. Ayayai…
^This. I would love to see the facts before I shoot Poole down so hard, but what he is proposing does not seem logical to me. How can public transit use go down if you build more of it? Its absolutely ludicrous. Its like saying public transit will go down after the Airport Metro station opens up. No sense.
The only way I can think of for transit trip percentage to go down while service goes up is if you have lots of new development away from the area served by transit, in particular, west of Krome. Hmmm….lots of new toll-paying customers for MDX…is this the underlying plan?
All of these plans assume traffic volumes will go up and up, which ignores something called “reality”. Gas prices, insurance rates, stagnant wages and a generational shift that values driving less are all factors working against the increasing auto-travel characterized by prior generations. In fact, Americans have been driving less for about the past 5 years now, and logged the fewest miles in 2011 since 2004. All signs point to that continuing, at perhaps a faster pace than the prior 5 years.
Google “Reason Foundation” and see what you find. It’s not surprising that this pathetic managed lanes scheme is being pushed by a so-called independent think tank. Reason is funded by an unholy alliance of oil companies, car makers, and ideologues.
yup
Expanding tolls so the rich can ride like Kings. Let’s just start an aristocracy here in the States like the UK.