Archive for the 'Carlos Giminez' Category

Miami Eye?

Preliminary discussion has begun over at County Hall exploring an option to create a large observation wheel somewhere within the county. The Ferris wheel, likely comparable to the London eye, would rotate numerous large enclosed observation pods slowly, providing riders with unobstructed views of the skyline and Bay. The project is the brainchild of Commissioner Carlos Gimenez and is currently undergoing preliminary feasibility studies before any commission decisions are made:
A second study would explore cost projections and begin a discussion of the idea’s public and political support, Gimenez said. If it passes committee today, the full commission would likely vote on Nov. 6 and ask for a report by early February.Your Thoughts?

Marlins Stadium Circus Continues

It’s hard to believe that the Marlins’ stadium saga could get even more bizarre (well, maybe not that hard to believe). Now Marlins owner Jeffrey Loria has come out opposing the Orange Bowl site, saying that a downtown site is the team’s sole focus and the only viable location for a new stadium in South Florida. From the Herald’s article on Saturday:
  • Loria: A downtown setting “would be much more beneficial to the franchise and fans…it’s very easy to get to…we must get it done”.
  • Team President David Sampson: “Our sole focus is completing a deal downtown.”
Wow. First of all, I’m a little curious as to why it took so long for Loria to come out publicly in support of the downtown site, especially given the adamant tone of his language. Secondly, if he felt this way all along, which is how it sounds, then this likely means the county commission has not only gone against good urban planning, history, and common sense in pushing for the Orange Bowl site, but they’ve also been pushing a site the team owner is not even interested in.

Predictably, the county commission reacted to Loria’s and Sampson’s statements with concern. Commission Chairman, Bruno Barreiro, stated “We’re just trying to get money from the state…we can’t get distracted by the site issue.” Oh, really? Well, if I had a vote on whether or not to allocate state funds to the construction of a new baseball stadium, I would certainly be more inclined to vote yea if I knew specifically where the building site was located, especially if it was in downtown Miami. But don’t take it from me. State Representative David Rivera, who ultimately controls the flow of legislation for House Speaker Marco Rubio, said “There might be a lack on consensus to build at the Orange Bowl.” Rivera then offered his support for a downtown stadium.

The really disconcerting piece form the article actually came from a commissioner who is now in support of the downtown site. “Commissioner Carlos Gimenez…was one of the strongest proponents of the Orange Bowl site (last month). Now, after studying transportation issues, he says it’s no longer his first option. ‘For me, I think baseball would work better in an urban, downtown site, he said’.” Holy cow! So apparently we have commissioners advocating for a Marlins’ stadium at the Orange Bowl without even studying the project’s transportation issues! That is just unacceptable. It’s pretty tough to debate the merits of a downtown Miami site versus an Orange Bowl site for a new stadium without studying, comprehending, or even considering transportation issues, for that matter. If the Herald piece is accurate, we have county commissioners making major decisions and guiding policy without even examining some of the most important, relevant details. At least he had it in him to change his mind. We’re still waiting for the rest of the commission to stop going against the grain (and logic, and history, and urban planning, and best practice, etc.).

Odds and Ends

  • Well it’s official, when visiting the Carnival Center for the performing arts this upcoming season you won’t have to leave the Benz at home with the Nanny and the kids. The Miami Parking Authority struck a deal with the Miami-Dade school board to manage all 770 parking spaces in 4 lots from 6 pm to 6 am weekdays and all day on weekends. One would think it wouldn’t be all that difficult for two different branches of government (Parking and Educational) to come to this agreement much sooner. Is there really that much bureaucratic red tape?
  • As is typical with any county run operation, the Airport North Terminal has finally run into the “Let’s make it look shitty to save money” stage of the project. Due to cost over-runs and a 2+ year delay on the project, our marvelous commissioners are endorsing a plan to “scale down” some of the terminal’s original features. This is why County projects never appear quite as nice as the renderings first depict; if only someone hadn’t squandered our money somewhere along the way county projects wouldn’t look so bad. Excellent quote from the article:

    “I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: We need to look to keep the expenses of the terminal project down,” Mr. Gimenez said after the meeting.

    Well, I said it too, but that was before you guys had the opportunity to screw up. I think we should require our commissioners to take some time and money management classes along with the ethics classes I recommended a while ago before they are eligible for election. One would think that these important management decisions would be left up to a qualified erudite professional with a proficiency in Construction Engineering or Urban Planning, rather than Gimenez’s unsuitable BA in Public Administration. Yes, I know he was consulted by professionals on his decisions, but, the elected officials have the final word, so… this mess ultimately falls on their shoulders. Re-election anyone?

You can read all about Gimenez’s Extensive list of Transportation related experience here, on the county commission website. Look at all those committees…Whoa…

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,