Report: "You are where you live"

The Ontario Professional Planners Institute (OPPI) recently came out with a report that, like so many other reports the last few years, illustrates the relationship between sprawl and obesity. The report argues that if planners are to reverse this crisis, they’ll need to find ways to get people out of cars and auto-centric communities and into denser, mixed-use neighborhoods where things are closer together. From the Toronto Star:
There’s no question there’s a connection between obesity, diabetes and heart-related diseases and the built environment, specifically sprawl, said co-author George McKibbon. Air quality is an issue, too, especially for those who live near highways. We also found that if you’re in a car four to five hours a day, social cohesion is at risk.

The report’s authors go on to say:

Good urban form is functional, economically and environmentally sustainable, and liveable, in a way that promotes public health. These communities offer a variety of housing options, facilities and open-space systems. They are walkable, cyclable, and include transit-oriented development, and promote alternatives to the single occupancy vehicle.

The report takes a close look at the issue of childhood obesity and how patterns of large, spread out schools have contributed by not allowing kids to walk to school. According to OPPI traffic engineer, Nick Poulos, simply by letting kids walk to and from school, we’d be healthier, pollution would be reduced, and neighborhood traffic would be reduced by 15 to 20 percent.

This is just one more reason why Miami needs to become denser and more transit-oriented. Do you know how much money per year is spent on obesity-related illness in the U.S. right now? Over $100 billion, including $60+ billion in direct medical costs and $50+ billion in lost productivity. That, my friends, is the very definition of a health and spending crisis.

You are where you live — think about it.

2 Responses to “Report: "You are where you live"”


  1. 1 Anonymous

    While the idea of recycling is great; Who wants to have that contraption in their neighborhood? In their commercial area? Forget it! It is immature, lacks any sense of architecture and while inventive, will not contribute to anything other than being toppled over by a hurricane. Containers are for the transport of goods, not for people!

  2. 2 Gabriel J. Lopez-Bernal

    Aside from not knowing how to comment on the proper article, you are also misinformed about the structural properties of steel.

    It is innovative, affordable, sustainable, and an effective way to build housing at half the cost of today’s typical construction prices.

    BTW, you clearly missed the point where they can be reinforced to become fully hurricane and corrosion proof…whoops…

Leave a Reply